iorewinsight.blogg.se

Aida64 extreme edition v3.20.2600 final
Aida64 extreme edition v3.20.2600 final








  1. #Aida64 extreme edition v3.20.2600 final windows 10
  2. #Aida64 extreme edition v3.20.2600 final pro

#Aida64 extreme edition v3.20.2600 final pro

I've included a few older CPUs as well, and I'm working on testing more of these, but for now I'm focusing on the current and previous generation of mainstream hardware (with the i9-7900X included as an extreme performance reference point).Īll systems are equipped with M.2 NVMe SSD storage for the OS and applications, and games are stored on a Samsung 850 Pro 2TB SATA SSD as a secondary drive.

#Aida64 extreme edition v3.20.2600 final windows 10

All the testing for this article was done in April/May of 2018, using the latest Windows 10 Pro release (prior to the April 2018 Update) and running the most recent motherboard firmware. With the Meltdown and Spectre exploits and patches causing a potential change in performance, I've also retested every processor. (It's not a massive change in performance compared to DDR4-3400 CL16, but it's good for an extra 0-2 percent). I also took time to check Ryzen performance with several memory kits, and eventually decided to retest all the Ryzen CPUs with the same G.Skill Trident Z DDR4-3200 CL14 memory that I use in the Z370 platform. I have X470 boards from Asus and MSI as well, which perform similarly. The basic summary is that the AM4 ecosystem is far more mature and ready for use than it was last year, and the X470 chipset improves stability and compatibility while bringing extra features like StoreMI.įor this review, I've tested the Ryzen 5 2600X and all the other Ryzen processors using Gigabyte's Aorus X470 Gaming 7 WiFi board. I've already discussed the platform changes and maturity level in the Ryzen 7 2700X review, so I won't delay any longer. That can help with thermals, which in turn helps with clockspeeds. The new 12nm LP process from GlobalFoundries provides for potentially smaller features, but AMD appears to be content to keep the same die size and transistor count-meaning the features might be smaller, but instead of shrinking the chip or adding more transistors, AMD gives the functional elements on the CPU a bit more padding. But if you're not going all-in on a top-of-the-line graphics card, that gaming potential is more theoretical than practical-and when you're building on a budget, getting more features and performance for less money is great.ĪMD's second generation of Ryzen processors, built on the 'Zen+' architecture, are mostly the same as the previous generation, but with some optimizations to improve performance and clockspeeds. It's also not faster than the Core i7-8700K, and for games it can't even beat the slightly less expensive Core i5-8400. The Ryzen 5 2600X isn't the fastest processor, even from AMD-that would be the Ryzen 7 2700X, or for multi-threaded workloads the Threadripper 1950X. For straightforward buying advice, check out our guide to the best CPU for gaming.










Aida64 extreme edition v3.20.2600 final